The short version: Brazil is now the most consequential market in iGaming affiliate marketing, Tier-1 Europe pays the most per player and restricts you the most, and the “tier” label on a geo tells you far less than its payout to acquisition cost ratio. This guide covers what each market actually pays, what the current rules allow you to do, and how to choose between them.
Most geo guides rank countries. That is the wrong output. Two affiliates working the same country with different traffic sources face different economics and different legal exposure, so the useful question is not which geo is best, it is which geo is best for the traffic you can actually get and the compliance load you can actually carry.
What actually decides a geo’s value
Three numbers, in this order:
- Payout per depositor, which is set by the market’s player value and your negotiating position.
- Cost to acquire that depositor, which is set by competition and by which channels the regulator permits.
- Compliance overhead, which is a real cost and is usually left out of the comparison entirely.
A $60 CPA in a market where depositors cost you $12 beats a $250 CPA in a market where they cost you $90, and it ties up far less working capital. Tier-1 becomes the right answer when you have the creative, language and compliance capability that a cheaper market does not reward.
Be careful with tier labels generally. They are not standardised. Published benchmark tables commonly place the Nordics and Australia in Tier 2 while other sources treat them as Tier 1, and the same disagreement applies to Eastern Europe. Read the payout ranges, not the label.
Brazil: the market that changed the map
Brazil moved from grey to regulated on 1 January 2025, under Law 14,790/2023 and Ordinance SPA/MF 827/2024, with the Secretaria de Prêmios e Apostas at the Ministry of Finance as regulator. Only authorised operators may take bets.
The first full regulated year produced BRL 37bn, roughly $7bn in gross gaming revenue, across 79 licensed operators. By the SPA’s own spreadsheet dated 15 July 2026, the market had 85 authorisations held by 82 companies, covering 188 brands. That is a large, licensed, competitive market, not an emerging one, and treating it as a frontier opportunity in 2026 is two years out of date.
The part that matters for affiliates
On 10 July 2026, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security published two new ordinances in the Diário Oficial da União that tighten the rules on betting advertising, grounded in the Consumer Defence Code and the 2023 betting law. The direction of travel is more restriction on how betting may be promoted and communicated, not less.
For a media buyer this changes the risk profile more than the payout table does. A market can be simultaneously the biggest opportunity by volume and a rising compliance cost, and Brazil is currently both. Political risk is live as well, with a push to ban casino verticals creating uncertainty for 2026.
Tier-1 regulated Europe and Canada: high value, high friction
United Kingdom
The most established market, highest player lifetime value, and the strictest advertising and affiliate standards. Operators pass their licence obligations down to affiliates contractually, so your creative is effectively regulated even though you are not the licensee.
Germany
Supervised by the Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder under the Interstate Treaty on Gambling. Enforcement has been tightening, and the 2026 evaluation of the State Treaty is under way, which makes it a market worth watching rather than one to build a fixed strategy around this year. Demand for sports betting and slots remains large.
Canada, specifically Ontario
Ontario’s regulated market launched in April 2022 under the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario. Affiliate compliance is one of the most scrutinised areas of that framework: the rules are strict, enforcement is public, and the financial penalties are significant. The Registrar’s Standards for Internet Gaming carry the operating detail, and registration alone does not keep you compliant.
Netherlands
Worth understanding precisely, because it is widely misreported. The Remote Gambling Act has licensed operators since 1 October 2021, and it created no licence, registration or approval requirement for affiliates, a position confirmed as of late 2025. That does not make the market permissive: operator obligations still flow down through contracts, and advertising restrictions are strict. It means the barrier is contractual rather than regulatory.
Sweden
Two changes matter. A September 2025 government memorandum proposes removing the so called targeting criterion, so the Gambling Act would apply to online gambling regardless of whether it is directed at the Swedish market. Separately, from 1 August 2026 new Spelpaus checks under Spelinspektionen regulation SIFS 2026:3 require licensed operators to check players against the self exclusion register at every login, at registration, and before any direct marketing. Expect tighter downstream requirements on affiliate promotion and on any list based traffic.
What the geos actually pay
Published 2026 benchmarks for casino CPA per first time depositor:
| Vertical | Tier 1 (UK, DE, CA) | Tier 2 (Nordics, AU) | Tier 3 (LatAm, SEA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Online casino | $150 to $350 | $100 to $250 | $40 to $120 |
| Sportsbook | $100 to $280 | $80 to $200 | $30 to $100 |
| Sweepstakes casino | $60 to $150 | $50 to $120 | $25 to $80 |
UK and Nordic casino traffic reaches the top of the range at $250 to $450 in deals reported for 2026. RevShare across iGaming clusters at 25% to 45% of net gaming revenue, median 30%. Which model suits which geo is covered in our breakdown of CPA, RevShare and hybrid structures, and the short answer is that high LTV Tier-1 players favour revenue share while volume markets favour CPA.
Compliance is a cost line, not a footnote
The single most common mistake in geo selection is comparing payouts without pricing the rules. Three practical consequences:
- Channel availability changes your real CPA. If paid social is effectively closed in a market, your blended acquisition cost is set by the channels that remain, not by the cheapest one you saw quoted.
- Creative approval cycles cost time. In heavily supervised markets, every asset is a potential liability and iteration slows down.
- Contractual flow down is the real constraint. In markets where affiliates are not licensed, the operator’s obligations still reach you through the agreement. Read what you are agreeing to enforce on yourself, and check it against our guide to advertising compliance by country.
How to choose, in practice
- Start from the traffic you can actually generate, not from a country list. Organic search capability in a language you write natively beats a theoretically richer market you cannot reach.
- Model payout divided by acquisition cost per geo, using your own historical costs rather than published averages.
- Add compliance overhead as a real number, including creative rework and the probability of losing an ad account.
- Test two geos at a time, not six. Cohorts need roughly 90 days before revenue share economics are readable.
- Re-check the rules quarterly. Three of the markets in this guide changed materially in the last twelve months.
Working with Soho Partners
We run casino and sportsbook offers across Tier-1 regulated markets, Brazil and LatAm, and selected Asian and African geos, with rates set per geo against traffic quality rather than from a single published card. If you tell us your geo mix and volume, we will quote against it rather than send you a rate sheet.
Sources
- Law 14,790/2023 and Ordinance SPA/MF 827/2024; Gambling Laws and Regulations Report 2026, Brazil, iclg.com
- Secretaria de Prêmios e Apostas licence spreadsheet, 15 July 2026; licence mapping via girodomercado.com
- Brazil first regulated year GGR figures, theigaming.eu and casinonewsdaily.com
- Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Justice betting advertising ordinances, published 10 July 2026, gov.br
- iGaming Ontario AGCO affiliate compliance guidance for 2026; Registrar’s Standards for Internet Gaming
- Netherlands Remote Gambling Act position on affiliates, ICLG Netherlands Gambling 2026
- Ds 2025:23, Swedish government memorandum on the scope of the Gambling Act; Spelinspektionen SIFS 2026:3, in force 1 August 2026
- Affiliate Commission Rates Benchmark 2026 and iGaming Affiliate Program Benchmarks 2026, track360.io
